GregF wrote:I agree "blowing up" isn't the problem.
No in fact, I/O MOTORS outlast outboards. Not to many 40 year old outboards sill running. I help people restore Starcraft boats, most of the 20 30 and 40 year old I/O boats are still running.
GregF wrote:It is the extra maintenance
Yeah they are more difficult (time consuming because of the cramped space on most boats) to maintain, but if done correctly will outlast ANY outboard.
GregF wrote:the fact you can't get the foot out of the water
Yep unless you happen to have a trailer which I do for both boats. Every season everything is cleaned and inspected. It's called not being lazy. Only needs to be done at the end of the season.
GregF wrote: lost interior space
Not really. The I/O version of the PC has MORE interior space than the outboard version. Everything is below deck on mine. The outboard cutout makes you lose space in it's sleeping quarters. I know because we looked at both boats at Bass Pro Shops prior to buying.
Somewhat true on the Starcraft but the outboard version of that boat has a HUGE splashwell that takes up more deck space than the entire motor does. The engine box is insulated and makes the motor quieter than most outboards. they are still made the same was as of the 2011 models. There's less deck space on the outboard version of every Starcraft with an outboard.
GregF wrote:in the boat and the difficulty of getting to the things down in the bilge.
True on the PC, NOT true on the Starcraft. The engine on that sits above deck. I can easily get to everything on that. I need a midget to help me maintain the PC. It's cool, I just lower him by his legs.[/quote]
GregF wrote:You also have the issue of the boat sinking if a rubber bellows fails.
Only happens if you fail to replace it at the recommended interval (3-7 seasons depending on annual inspection). Not true on the PC either. The engine pod would just fill up but would not sink the boat. If a bellows fails that bad, 99.99999 percent of the time it was due to neglect.
I'd bet MORE vessels with outboards sank due to swamping over the stern than a failed boot in an I/O equipped boats.
GregF wrote:Then you have the heat exchanger thing.
What thing ? In a closed cooing system, the heat exchanger is sacrificial and has a replacement interval. Closed cooled I/Os RARELY need manifold replacement so closed cooling is more desirable.
GregF wrote:Raw water cooling is not even worth considering.
Why ? Both of my boats are raw water cooled. Never had an issue with any of them. Again, replace the manifolds and you get decades out of an I/O.
GregF wrote:A came down here from a culture of I/Os (in Md)
Yep, I/Os well outnumber outboards up here, especially boats for hire, commercial fishing boats and ALL go fast boats. Most everything that goes offshore are I/Os.
GregF wrote:and found nobody here really likes them. It took me a while to get on board myself.
Most people that don't like I/Os either can't or won't do the maintenance required and probably would be better off buying an outboard. I like them because the longevity versus an outboard.
GregF wrote:I suppose I could shoot a video at a couple marinas here so we can see what the mix is. I am not even sure where I could find a dealer who sells I/Os.
See above, if there's no market for them then why sell them ? Up here I can buy parts pretty much everywhere if needed.
GregF wrote:I suppose they could all be wrong. They seem to be wrong about everything else.

See above, some people lease cars because they won't do maintenance. That's what society is becoming (throwaway). Me, I'm proud of my 43 year old boat that hasn't given me a day of trouble.
GregF wrote:At least we agree outboards are easier to maintain.
Easier to
access, yeah. But the 3.0 liter is so basic it needs no special tools to maintain, unlike today's outboards. No computer, no code reader, 2 belts, a carb, that's it. If it's running crappy a carb rebuild, nothing else ever fails on them.