You know the drill..
Moderators: Redneck_Randy, badmoonrising, lakerunner
-
mzodarg
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 1:07 am
- Location: S.W. Oklahoma
#76
Post
by mzodarg » Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:25 am
RobZ71LM7 wrote:$650 for 2 mph.... I'd be thrilled! Realistically speaking that's not bad at all, even before you consider that on a 2-toon without strakes returns diminish quickly past a certain point. IIRC aren't you the same guy that went from a 5.3 Silverado to a 2500 Duramax to pull your pontoon? You may just have unrealistic expectations.
Yeah that would be me, I agree my expectations were high. Some of that was based on reviews I had read and I'm one who will review an item based on facts and real world experience.
If I based my review on $650 for 2 MPH I would have to say, put that money somewhere else. I do like the hole shot, it's got a lot of torque. That's the good, What I have trouble understanding is even if I'm over propped I should have picked a skosch of RPM increase but I had zero increase.
As far as the Duramx vs a 5.3 no comparison. I got what I paid for when I bought the diesel and again when I had it Dyno tuned..Just saying.
Mike
[color=#0000FF]2015 Sun Tracker 22' DLX Fishn Barge-Schwintek power Bimini-Merc Eco Monitor
2015 Mercury 90hp (Simon Motorsports tuned )Command Thrust FourStroke[b] not worth the coin
[/color]
-
Bryden24shp
- Posts: 1873
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:28 am
- Location: Iowa/Lake of the Ozarks, Mo.
-
Contact:
#77
Post
by Bryden24shp » Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:04 pm
The biggest gain I noticed was the fuel usage after the burn. I gained holeshot, midrange punch and a bit of speed. But my best gain was in fuel burn. It paid for itself in fuel savings. But, we are talking taking a 225 to 310 (318hp on the dyno). I was extremely happy with my burn... Like I said, if you're not happy with yours, call Eric, he will re-burn to stock and refund your money. He's a good guy who knows his business. If you're unhappy---He is unhappy!
-
teecro
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:23 am
- Location: Sunset Bay, TN
#78
Post
by teecro » Mon Apr 25, 2016 5:36 am
Bryden24shp wrote:The biggest gain I noticed was the fuel usage after the burn. I gained holeshot, midrange punch and a bit of speed. But my best gain was in fuel burn. It paid for itself in fuel savings. But, we are talking taking a 225 to 310 (318hp on the dyno). I was extremely happy with my burn... Like I said, if you're not happy with yours, call Eric, he will re-burn to stock and refund your money. He's a good guy who knows his business. If you're unhappy---He is unhappy!
Comments like this are what help me keep an open mind about realist expectations about the burn and it is a sad fact that (1) I simply don't have enough history with my 75 motor. (2) I may have had unattainable expectations since I truly gained so much speed in going from the 60 to the 75 as by all accounts I gained nearest to an honest 12 miles an hour. (3) I changed the Bimini top configuration in a big way before testing the ECM... If this burn gives me fuel economy that I did not have SUPER, if this burn gives me torque reserves to least keep my speed up while I'm loaded for bear and pulling tubes then again SUPER...

- clean and wet.jpg (122.48 KiB) Viewed 2542 times
Truthfully I'm just pretty happy that I've been able to include just about every feature the larger higher-end boats have, make them work with little compromise yet keep a very small boat cozy and intamite...
-
Attachments
-

- table.jpg (89.42 KiB) Viewed 2542 times
T CRO
2017 Berkshire CTS 24 RFX with Yamaha F150/Simomized 200
2015 Caravelle 16 EBo with Mercury 90
-
Bryden24shp
- Posts: 1873
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:28 am
- Location: Iowa/Lake of the Ozarks, Mo.
-
Contact:
#79
Post
by Bryden24shp » Mon Apr 25, 2016 12:30 pm
Cro's Nest.... I like it!
Nice boat, Buddy! And you keep it in very nice shape. It will last you a good long time...