Flo torque ii vs iii

You know the drill..

Moderators: Redneck_Randy, badmoonrising, lakerunner

Post Reply
Message
Author
Themacdadt
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 4:56 pm

Flo torque ii vs iii

#1 Post by Themacdadt » Fri Mar 27, 2015 1:05 pm

I have a flo torque iii on my opti 75, went to my local marine shop to get a extra drive sleeve to have on the boat just in case I need one. The guy sold me a flo torque ii and said it will work for the flow torque iii.

Is this correct? Why would there be differant part numbers for the sleeves if so?
Being its for a spare to keep on hand I won't know till the time comes I may need it so I just want to make sure.
Thanks
Todd

2008 Beachcomber 20 ft.
2006 Mercury optimax 75
East coast central fl. Cocoa beach.

User avatar
PlaynDoc
Posts: 1600
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:32 am
Location: Milner, Georgia

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#2 Post by PlaynDoc » Fri Mar 27, 2015 1:28 pm

A flo torque is an interesting piece of machinery... sounds quite impressive.... the differences between a i, ii, and iii must be perplexing, even to the highest educated mechanic.... sometimes the opti 75 acts like a 76, and sometimes i before e, except after c, unless you're using version ii. if you're using version ii, you must keep in mind the geometry of the torque is greater than the angle in version iii. version i was outdated when the capacitor began missing beats, so it was replaced with an interchangeable version ii and ii.02....
2011 SunChaser DS22
Mercury 115 EFI
13.75 x 15p

Themacdadt
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 4:56 pm

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#3 Post by Themacdadt » Fri Mar 27, 2015 1:39 pm

PlaynDoc wrote:A flo torque is an interesting piece of machinery... sounds quite impressive.... the differences between a i, ii, and iii must be perplexing, even to the highest educated mechanic.... sometimes the opti 75 acts like a 76, and sometimes i before e, except after c, unless you're using version ii. if you're using version ii, you must keep in mind the geometry of the torque is greater than the angle in version iii. version i was outdated when the capacitor began missing beats, so it was replaced with an interchangeable version ii and ii.02....
So your answer is??
Todd

2008 Beachcomber 20 ft.
2006 Mercury optimax 75
East coast central fl. Cocoa beach.

User avatar
PlaynDoc
Posts: 1600
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:32 am
Location: Milner, Georgia

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#4 Post by PlaynDoc » Fri Mar 27, 2015 1:43 pm

Themacdadt wrote:
PlaynDoc wrote:A flo torque is an interesting piece of machinery... sounds quite impressive.... the differences between a i, ii, and iii must be perplexing, even to the highest educated mechanic.... sometimes the opti 75 acts like a 76, and sometimes i before e, except after c, unless you're using version ii. if you're using version ii, you must keep in mind the geometry of the torque is greater than the angle in version iii. version i was outdated when the capacitor began missing beats, so it was replaced with an interchangeable version ii and ii.02....
So your answer is??

my answer.... W T F is a flo torque?
2011 SunChaser DS22
Mercury 115 EFI
13.75 x 15p

Themacdadt
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 4:56 pm

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#5 Post by Themacdadt » Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:13 pm

PlaynDoc wrote:
Themacdadt wrote:
PlaynDoc wrote:A flo torque is an interesting piece of machinery... sounds quite impressive.... the differences between a i, ii, and iii must be perplexing, even to the highest educated mechanic.... sometimes the opti 75 acts like a 76, and sometimes i before e, except after c, unless you're using version ii. if you're using version ii, you must keep in mind the geometry of the torque is greater than the angle in version iii. version i was outdated when the capacitor began missing beats, so it was replaced with an interchangeable version ii and ii.02....
So your answer is??

my answer.... W T F is a flo torque?
Lol......
Todd

2008 Beachcomber 20 ft.
2006 Mercury optimax 75
East coast central fl. Cocoa beach.

User avatar
BobG
Posts: 1842
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 6:24 am
Location: Gilpin County, CO

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#6 Post by BobG » Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:17 pm

Themacdadt wrote: So your answer is??
The tangential torque vector of the ii is modulated across the bandwidth of the stern wave to produce subsonic resonance which will cause palpitations in bikini-cad wimmin within a radius approximately equal to:

(OAL / rpm) + pi**displacement(in cc's) (result in millifurlongs, of course).

Note that OAL is the overall length of ALL your pontoons, so if you have a 24 foot tritoon, it's 24 * 3

By contrast, the iii is black plastic. (Some wimmin prefer that.)
2012 Tahoe 24' Fish-n-Fun Tritoon, with Mercury 115 HP 4-Stroke
"Trine SS Cape" (Trying 2S Cape)
Add a battery: viewtopic.php?t=13546&p=105893#p105893
I'm not a liberal, but I play one on this site.

Themacdadt
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 4:56 pm

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#7 Post by Themacdadt » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:05 pm

BobG wrote:
Themacdadt wrote: So your answer is??
The tangential torque vector of the ii is modulated across the bandwidth of the stern wave to produce subsonic resonance which will cause palpitations in bikini-cad wimmin within a radius approximately equal to:

(OAL / rpm) + pi**displacement(in cc's) (result in millifurlongs, of course).

Note that OAL is the overall length of ALL your pontoons, so if you have a 24 foot tritoon, it's 24 * 3

By contrast, the iii is black plastic. (Some wimmin prefer that.)
The ii is black plastic also....SO I guess no one knows with absolute certainty what the answer is?
Todd

2008 Beachcomber 20 ft.
2006 Mercury optimax 75
East coast central fl. Cocoa beach.

User avatar
Bamby
Posts: 1409
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:30 am
Location: Near Wheeling W.V.

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#8 Post by Bamby » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:21 pm

Respect Our Recreational Resources
Leaving Only "The Footprints of Your Passing"

Boating the Muskingum River
1972 35' Crest Pontoon Houseboat
2007 90 hp. Yamaha

User avatar
tuned
Posts: 1259
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:40 pm

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#9 Post by tuned » Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:21 pm

Some of these guys are really stuck on 'flux capacitors' and are trying to get you Back to the Future. I applaud them heartily.
A serious reply that you shouldn't take too seriously as I am no expert:
FloTorque is a unique system developed by Mercury Marine. The concept is as follows...Start by throwing out all your old props as you can't use them. Then buy a FloTorque prop. The most common insert system is the FloTorque II (I use them). The prop basically has a smooth square hole in the center rather than a round one with splines. A very tough square delrin insert along with an adaptor for your particular motor's splines goes into the prop. The whole mess gets bolted onto the outdrive along with some thrust washers and such.
The beauty of the system is several-fold. First, the plastic insert acts as a 'shear pin' of sorts. If you hit a rock, you will 'spin your prop' kind of like the old rubber hubs used to. This insert actually sacrifices itself so your gearing doesn't get eaten during the strike.
It is super easy to swap out inserts. Most people don't even bother carrying a second prop, rather just a small bag of parts and inserts. Even the lock washer was redesigned and a bit easier to take off and on.
Mercury was genius in developing adaptors for all splines of most brands. This allows a person to put a FloTorque prop on just about any motor made!
The FT IIIs and IVs have various 'shock absorber' goodies in them. I don't know much about them, but I believe they are mostly used on lower HP motors.
Now if I could only get my gravity inductor above 80% :biggrin2
ToddBob
'Al the Mirthmaker' (The Third)
Build-- viewtopic.php?f=16&t=14007
Rainy Lake/Voyageurs National Park
International Falls, MN

LadyGT
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:14 pm
Location: Warner Robins, GA

Re: Flo torque ii vs iii

#10 Post by LadyGT » Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:44 am

Great explanation!
Denise and Jim
2015 Encore 22' Cruise SE Grey
2001 Ford F250 Turbo Diesel

Post Reply